On 1/2/10, paul stenquist <[email protected]> wrote: > Don't rule out the new DA* zooms. They're as good or better than many primes. > I would venture to say that the DA* 16-50/2.8 is better than the old 24/2.8 > prime. I once shot nothing but primes. I think I bought my first zoom just a > few years ago after 30 years of shooting primes. But I'm very happy with the > DA( 16-50, 50-134 and 60-250.
Anyone got the DA * 17-70/4 and if so, what do you think? Is the image quality up to snuff? It is heavier and more expensive than 16-45, but it goes longer and has SDM. The 16-50 is definitely too heavy & expensive for me, but this might not be. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
