(Not that there's anything wrong with Bill Robb. Much.)
I'd MARK! that but it might be too much of an inside joke...
On 1/15/2010 3:06 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Tom C wrote:
I'm with them for basically 5 reasons:
1. My first SLR was a $50 MX. And I continued to buy glass, to where
when I went to an AF SLR, it made economic sense to go with Pentax
instead of a Nikon 8008s.
2. My style/subject doesn't usually require high AF performance, high
frame rate, or stellar high ISO performance, so the benefit of
switching is less for me than it may be for others.
3. It still is a sizeable piece of change to go with a new body and lens lineup.
4. I'm lazy.
5. William Robb
That's great! My list is so close to this one that it isn't worth the
effort to change the details.
I'll replace the 5th item with the entire PDML, though.
(Not that there's anything wrong with Bill Robb. Much.)
--
{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1033{\fonttbl{\f0\fnil\fcharset0 Courier
New;}}
\viewkind4\uc1\pard\f0\fs20 I've just upgraded to Thunderbird 3.0 and the
interface subtly weird.\par
}
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
