I wouldn't say the AF sucks. Maybe when compared to much more expensive Nikons, 
but as it is I think "sucks" is too strong. Sure, it needs improvement but then 
so do the resolution and iso range.

I use Pentax because:

1. I like the glass
2. Brand loyalty (always used Pentax)
3. Price is right
4. I haven't had a camera fail and cost me money (either during a paid gig or 
for repairs)

That's more than enough for me.

-Brendan 



----- Original Message ----
> From: Igor Roshchin <s...@komkon.org>
> To: PDML@pdml.net
> Sent: Fri, January 15, 2010 9:36:17 AM
> Subject: Why Pentax?
> 
> 
> In view of various comments from people about K-7 and K-x, I've been
> thinking, - why am I shooting with Pentax?
> This is a summary of my thoughts - I'd like to hear what others think
> about this.
> 
> In the past few weeks I realized that compared to other brand DSLR's
> Pentax DSLRs (even the "flagman" K-7) has serious problems.
> In crude terms:
> 1. The AF sucks.
> 2. The low-light performance sucks.
> 
> 3. The P-TTL performance is inconsistent (I don't know how
> I-TTL/E-TTL etc. are in that regard - any comments?)
> 
> So, I was re-thinking my use of Pentax.
> I started with ZX-5n back in 1997. The reason I chose it over Nikon
> was that I didn't like ergonomics of N70/F70, and couldn't afford N90.
> ZX-5n had incredible ergonomics, especially after coming from an
> all-manual SLR (Kiev-19) where I could set everything blind-folded;
> ZX-5n had all-analog knobs and buttons.
> Despite lack of continuous AF that is found in Nikon models,
> I enjoyed my ZX-5n greatly. 
> 
> When the time came to buy a DSLR, I thought if I should switch to 
> a Nikon, but decided to get *ist DS. And I've been rather happy with it
> for over 4.5 years by now.
> Yes, the low-light performance has been bothering me a lot, and 
> while until recently I didn't suffer much from the shortcomings of the 
> AF, - I just learned to work around it.
> 
> In the last 2-3 years, I started taking photos at dance events,
> and that's where quick and accurate AF matters, and low light
> performance and an accurate flash are important.
> So, why am I still using Pentax, and buying new bodies and lenses?
> 
> While thinking about it, I recalled a very old joke about two worms.
> A son and his father are seating in a pile of bull sh.. manure, and
> talking:
> -- Daddy, is it nice to live in that grove across the field?
> -- Yes, son.
> -- Daddy, is there plenty of food over there?
> -- Yes, son.
> -- Then why, daddy, we live in this pile of bull sh..?
> -- Because that's our Motherland.
> ...
> 
> 
> I still like Pentax. 
> I don't like at all the consumer line of Canons (Rebels etc.).
> I seem to like mid-line of Nikon's circa 2005-2008 but have almost 
> no idea about their more recent (and higher) models.
> I've been looking at Panasonics that are highly regarded by some
> PDMLers, but I am not sure if they have that good AF and low-light
> performance.
> 
> As for Pentax, I am currently evaluating if I should exchange the K-7
> for a K-x for a better low-light performance.
> 
> I just got a K-x that I will try "in action" during the weekend.
> My first impression of a K-x is that functionality- and layout-wise,
> it is very reminiscent of the DS. But I was rather disappointed by the 
> lack of the small top status display.
> I don't mind the versitality of the AA's (I use them for the flash
> anyway).
> K-x is lighter, but compared to K-7 the feel a bit plasticy; 
> more so than that for DS.
> I like that the choice of the AF mode, ISO and exponometry mode
> in the K-7 is done by physical switches, not via the menu.
> 
> 
> I would be glad to hear what others have to say about these thoughts.
> 
> Igor
> 
> PS. The obvious short response "BS" is not accepted. ;-)
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.



      

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to