On Jan 18, 2010, at 6:05 PM, Tim Bray wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Igor Roshchin <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> On another hand, I was very impressed by using 50-135/2.8 under the
>> same conditions. I am afraid I am sold on that lens.
> 
> If I were asked to name the best lens (any camera, any format) I'd
> ever owned...  I couldn't.  But if I were making top-3-candidates
> lists that 50-135 would be on all of them. It's a honey.  If it were
> half the size/weight it'd be perfect.  -T
> 
If it were half the size and weight, it would be made of plastic and have a 
maximum ap of 5.6.
Paul
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to