The MZ-S tested at 93% and most of the rest of the MZ series finders are actually not so bad when compared to similar sized AF cameras. Geebs it was just a joke to :-)
--- Mike Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I remember Mike was complaining about Pentax > finders, > > well since Nikon is supposed to have better > finders > > and they just released a new camera maybe this > will > > fit the bill :) > > > > > http://www.nikon-image.com/eng/news_release/2001/f55.htm > > > The opposite. That's a typical entry-level > mirror-box finder like the EOS > Rebel, about 90% coverage. Good enough if you send > your neg film to the > drugstore, where their automated printers are going > to cut off more than 10% > anyway. > > I was complaining about the other end, where Nikon > offers the F5 (100% > coverage, although it's actually just slightly > inaccurate) and the F100 (96% > coverage). Pentax doesn't currently have ANY camera > with finder coverage as > good as either of these. > > --Mike > ______________________________________________________________________ Web-hosting solutions for home and business! http://website.yahoo.ca - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
