From: "Ken Waller"
You could spend weeks/months 'becomming familiar with the wolf's habits',
>> assuming you first located the wolf (ves)
>>
>>> Set up camera pointing at the fence section, set up an IR trigger to
>>> take a picture when the wolf broke the light beam, go have a beer and
>>> come back later to pick up the camera equipment.
>>
>> You could spend weeks/months after finding the wolf waiting for it to
>> pass by, and hopefully jumping over the obsticle.
>
> Since it was, apparently, a captive wolf, it's kind of moot, isn't it?
Yep, but originally it was presented as wild , IIRC
I believe he STILL insists the wolf was in the wild.
The one point I've seen in his favor is the "tame" wolf they're claiming
he rented for the shot has a chewed up right ear. The wolf in the
photograph doesn't. I understand the persons claiming it is staged are
saying that wolf could have got into a fight after the photo was taken
and had its ear chewed up then, but that's mighty weak.
Considering the "tame" wolf IS for rent, and has apparently been for
rent for a long time, how hard could it be to find a photo of of that
wolf taken before the photographer in question took his own photo?
So we get back to "he said - they said". "They" said the wolf "he"
photographed is a model, but the in the photographs the model has
obvious injuries not seen in submitted photograph, and "they" have not
provided a convincing [to me] explanation for that difference.
The only thing that I take away from the controversy at this point is
the contest organizers are completely incompetent.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
