So this means I should keep the M3 and assorted lenses I inherited from
my Dad? I think I have a couple of stainless (hah) cans and reels
somewhere in the garage. A couple of plastic bottles and a can
developer (who's making developer now??) I can scan negatives with my
ancient Photosmart scanner (the original but it sounds as though I want
to pick up a flatbed for serious (Well, semi-serious) work. I have
never been really happy with the HP.
John Graves
WA1JG
[email protected]
paul stenquist wrote:
On Jan 24, 2010, at 11:37 PM, Pasvorn Boonmark wrote:
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 2:51 PM, paul stenquist <[email protected]> wrote:
I think I'll just see what I can do scanning from film on my flatbed Epson 3200.
Then again, maybe I'll get ambitious:-).
Paul,
The 3200 can scan film, no?
Yes. I was surprised, once again, that the 3200 can actually deliver very
respectable results scanning 35mm negatives. The scans are good enough to make
nice 11 x 14 prints. A top end dedicated film scanner would, of course, be much
better. But without having to stand up to a side-by-side comparison, the
flatbed scans look good.
Paul
I have an Epson 1650 and I use it to scan film, if I need to.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.730 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2642 - Release Date: 01/24/10 02:33:00
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
