I don't have a Kx, but at the size presented, it's impossible to accurately gauge the amount of noise in that photo.
That being said, at this small size, the pic appears to be quite clean. Excellent shot BTW. Paul On Jan 29, 2010, at 7:33 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote: > I am curious for those who may have experience with the low light > capabilities of the K-x how much better it might be than this. > > This was shot with my K20D @ ISO 3200. > http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/imgp1928.htm > > I seem to be encountering more low light (or rather somewhat poor > light) situations where I need to freeze action, so the shutter speed needs > to be up a bit. I've been toying with the idea of getting a K-x to > supplement the K20D mostly for the low light/high iso situations. > Would it be much of an improvement? Could I get another stop or two > light at this noise level? > > Thanks for any thoughts you have. > > > -- > Best regards, > Bruce > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
