Tom C wrote:
I just like it to look right.
Yeah, me too Tom - but my point was really that I do not understand why
on the same monitor the
amount of brightness is different from one browser to the next and hoped
someone could explain.
ann
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 8:24 PM, ann sanfedele <[email protected]> wrote:
Interesting -- (I agree with what Paul said below)
But - When I look at the photo in Netscape I wonder why everyone is saying
the rocks are a bit blown out
but when I look at it in Firefox , it looks too light overall.
I like the shot, but it sure shows me how difficult it is to even say
anything about such stuff when even
on one's own computer the same photo looks different.
ann
paul stenquist wrote:
An excellent shot overall. Nice composition, great sky. Burning in the
rocks with the tool set to highlights would be a good thin, perhaps combined
with clipping them a bit in levels. But it's much better as shown than I
expected after reading all the blather that follows:-). Good work.
Paul
On Feb 6, 2010, at 12:25 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
http://pentax-ways.blogspot.com/2010/02/peso-2010-07.html
Please be brutal and honest, but I say my copy of FA 20/2.8 is pretty
darn good after Pentax Israel have replaced a broken part in its AF
mechanism.
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
