On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 6:06 AM, Mark Roberts <[email protected]> wrote:
> No one gets the boot. But since sharpening is (or should be) a > function of print size, and you don't know what the print size is > going to be (hell, *we* don't know how big your photo will be > presented yet), less sharpening is better. Bigger size = less > sharpening. Over-sharpened shots will, by necessity, be reproduced > smaller in the book. Well, I've already submitted my three, and the one I suspect will be chosen will not need sharpening, that's for sure. ;-) So this question is hypothetical (for next year maybe). I almost always selectively sharpen. Usually it's just the subject, sometimes just the face of the subject. Most of the frame remains unsharpened. How (if at all) could that be accomodated? Thanks. cheers, frank -- "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
