On Feb 24, 2010, at 10:39 PM, Rob Studdert wrote: > On 25/02/2010, paul stenquist <pnstenqu...@comcast.net> wrote: > >> The K7 high iSO performance is decent -- at least a stop better than the >> K20D. It's quite acceptable at 6400 and darn good at 3200. And it's metering >> is apparently far better than the Kx. That counts for a lot at high ISO. > > Paul I appreciate your enthusiasm for the K7 but if I bought the K7 > I'd feel just as stupid as I do now for buying the K20D. And if I > intended to buy anything more costly than the K-x now it wouldn't be a > Pentax.
And I admire your enthusiasm for the KX. But the K7 isn't the K20D, so your reasoning doesn't make much sense. I think the camera deserves a fair appraisal. Your evaluation, which is apparently based only on hearsay, doesn't meet that standard. > > -- > Rob Studdert (Digital Image Studio) > Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours > Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
