Since I didn't buy the K20D at the beginning of it's life cycle, but
near the end, I didn't pay a lot more for it than a K-x is going for
right now. So I guess I don't feel particularly stupid for making the
purchase. I also didn't trade up from a K10D so the improvement in
capability was considerable. If I could have waited another 3 months I
probably would have gotten a K-7 and I know I wouldn't be carping about
it's shortcomings.
On 2/24/2010 10:39 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:
On 25/02/2010, paul stenquist<[email protected]> wrote:
The K7 high iSO performance is decent -- at least a stop better than the K20D.
It's quite acceptable at 6400 and darn good at 3200. And it's metering is
apparently far better than the Kx. That counts for a lot at high ISO.
Paul I appreciate your enthusiasm for the K7 but if I bought the K7
I'd feel just as stupid as I do now for buying the K20D. And if I
intended to buy anything more costly than the K-x now it wouldn't be a
Pentax.
--
{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1033{\fonttbl{\f0\fnil\fcharset0 Courier
New;}}
\viewkind4\uc1\pard\f0\fs20 I've just upgraded to Thunderbird 3.0 and the
interface subtly weird.\par
}
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
