On 27/2/10, AlunFoto, discombobulated, unleashed: >I fully endorse your POV that this doesn't happen most of the time >because the police is reasonable. I have a good story about private >security guards on the Canary Wharf to the same tune. However I do >think there's something wrong, somewhere, when mistakes happen as >often as they do, without any visible and measurable positive effect >in how the police actually protects us from the real bad guys. > >Up here in this frostpit, it is maintained that intelligence and >undercover work is the only way to root out and stop the bad guys. >Experience says that there are always some bad guys flying under that >radar too, but raising the issue draws weight away from arguments for >searching the ordinary bloke with a camera.
Trust the Norwegians to talk some sense :) On that bombshell, I'm bowing out of this thread. Cheers..... -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ---------- http://www.cottysnaps.com _____________________________ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
