Mike, Thanks for the reply from Ctein. As I come up with specific questions, I'll try to shoot them to you to pass on, if you don't mind.
Bruce Dayton Monday, January 21, 2002, 5:11:21 AM, you wrote: MJ> Here's Ctein's reply in re P67 lenses, for Bruce Dayton and others: MJ> The reference to the lens is because I traded him an SMCP-M 50/1.7 for a box MJ> of photo paper. <s> MJ> --Mike >>>>> MJ> Dear Mike, MJ> Hi, there! I got the two newsletters and I actually got to read them a MJ> couple of days ago. Great! (more comments later in the letter) 0h, and by MJ> the way, I did get the 50 mm lens, and it checks out just fine. Tests out MJ> almost exactly the same as my current 50 mm, which makes me happy. Now I MJ> have a backup in case I break that one. MJ> If Bruce wants to ask me about specific lenses, I might be able to help MJ> him, but I doubt that I have anywhere near the depth of information about MJ> Pentax 6 X 7 lenses that you folks expect. When he asks about things like MJ> "SMC Tak versions vs. contemporary versions," I just don't have a clue. MJ> Remember that I am NOT a lens connoisseur and I generally don't track this MJ> stuff. I just know how to run a good test. If he can ask some very MJ> specific questions, I can provide very specific answers ... which may very MJ> well be "I don't know" but at least I can try, and I would be happy to give MJ> it a go. MJ> <<<< MJ> - MJ> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, MJ> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to MJ> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
