I left a pretty harsh comment on that page. A choice quote from the review, talking about comparing high ISO images from the Nikon D40 and the K-x:
"To make them the same size, I reduced the K-x shot by 50% (12mp vs 6 mp) which actually makes it look better. I have no idea how this can be, but I can only tell it as it is." Clearly this person should not be let loose on a camera review site. On my website I have part 1 of a 3-part review of the K-x: http://enticingthelight.com/2010/03/22/review-pentax-k-x-part-1-first-look/ It's being written by my collaborator, a wedding photographer who bought the K-x for low-light church shooting. He's been gushing about it for the last 2 weeks and has sent me some comparison shots with the K20D that show the K-x to be noticeable superior at high ISO in low light. Cheers, --M. -- http://EnticingTheLight.com A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment On 1 April 2010 10:24, Perry Pellechia <[email protected]> wrote: > I quote one of the comments: > "The moral of the story is ‘if you look hard enough on the internet > you’re bound to find someone even dumber than Ken Rockwell’." > > > http://goo.gl/3yFn > > > <----------------------------------------------------> > Perry Pellechia > Home Page: http://homer.chem.sc.edu/perry > <----------------------------------------------------> -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
