Hey, and one K10D user too :-) --M.
On 02/04/2010, John Francis <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 02:12:41PM -0400, John Sessoms wrote: >> From: P N Stenquist >>> On Apr 2, 2010, at 10:23 AM, Adam Maas wrote: >>>> > That they would, but even better would be a K-7x with the K-x >>>> > processing chain and either the K-x's 12MP sensor or Sony's closely >>>> > related 14.6MP sensor. I'm seriously hoping we're going to see that >>>> > soon (perhaps for Photokina?). >>>> > >>>> > I'd really love to have the K-x's IQ with the K-7's metering and AF >>>> > (metering in particular is a weak point of the K-x). >>>> > >>> >>> I'm not so sure I'd want that. The K7 seems to have better detail >>> rendering than the Kx at low to moderate ISO. Good low light >>> performance is a nice plus, but for most work it's secondary. >> >> So, how about a camera that combined the K7's metering, AF, and low to >> moderate ISO performance with the K-x's high ISO performance? >> >> And since we're off wishing in la-la land anyway, it'll be an 18 - 20 MP >> full-frame sensor in 135 format as well for well under $2K. ;-D > > Now you're getting silly. > > I seriously expect any mid-life kicker for the K-7 (let's call it the K-7x, > although I think K-7n is a rather more likely name) would have the features > that you list, with at least the pixel count, frame rate, etc. of the K-7. > > It appears that several K20 owners on the list are holding on for a while > to see if such a camera shows up; if it does, they'll probably buy one. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- Sent from my mobile device http://EnticingTheLight.com A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
