From: Margus M?nnik
John Sessoms wrote:
> From: Margus M?nnik
>> Somewhy many people think "wow, it looks so good, so it has to be
>> also very smart". No, I-10 is technically quite an average compact.
>> But it still looks cool :) For me, Optio I-10 is one of the very few
>> things (and the only camera) in my life that I have bought purely
>> because how it looks.
>>
>> BR, Margus
>>
>>
>> P. J. Alling wrote:
>>> > No, I didn't write it. Unfortunately it confirms pretty much what
>>> I > expected.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> http://www.neutralday.com/pentax-optio-i-10-digital-compact-camera-in-depth-review/
>>> >
>>> >
>
> I think a lot of people see the "retro" styling and expect it to be a
> digital Auto-110. They're disappointed when they find out it's not.
>
For being "digital Auto110" I-10 should have 1) interchangeable lenses,
2) decent optical viewfinder and 3) larger sensor. Right now it is just
a compact camera with cool body and should be treated like one.
Yeah, I think the problem is people WANT it to be a "digital Auto110".
It's not.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
