On 14/04/2010, paul stenquist <[email protected]> wrote: > No roasting:-). But based on what I've seen, I think the K7 sensor is > considerably better than the Kx at all but high ISO. And even at high ISO, it > renders more detail. Now, I don't have both cameras, so my opinion is based > on impressions gleaned from web images, but I'd be surprised if real testing > didn't reveal the same. That being said, I think the Kx is a fine camera for > the money. It doesn't match my shooting style or needs, so I wouldn't want > one, but I applaud the success that Pentax has had with it.
I'm sure that the K7 has a slight resolution advantage, but as soon as I stitch even just a pair of images the resolution argument is absolutely null and void. These days resolution is easy to achieve, if you absolutely need to capture the image in one shot sure the K7 would have a slight advantage but a top line Canon would do the job far better in every performance metric but physical size. Regarding low ISO shots I'm sure the K-x would have a DR advantage over the K7 (there's just nothing between the K20 and K7 in this regard and I know the K20 has less available DR as I can compare them side by side). The high ISO advantage of the K-x has to be personally experienced to appreciate I expect, the successor to the K7 will hopefully make this performance advantage more apparent. -- Rob Studdert (Digital Image Studio) Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
