On Apr 16, 2010, at 11:44 PM, Adam Maas wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Stan Halpin
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> As I have mentioned, my father-in-law passed away recently. Through his 80's 
>> he was an active photographer with a primary emphasis on supporting the 
>> local theater guild, etc. with portraits and production shots. Also CD 
>> covers for professional musicians, etc. He traded some of his good gear in 
>> on a Nikon D50 a couple of years ago. (At 95+, he never did figure out the 
>> whole digital thing. Couldn't understand a film-less camera. But as long as 
>> I loaded and unloaded his SD card, and assured him that there was film in 
>> the camera, he could still do his photo thing.) Of the remaining equipment, 
>> the Hassleblad + lenses etc. went to his son. Nobody seems to care about the 
>> Nikon F3 and older Nikkor lenses. My sister-in-law has one Leica body and 
>> lens purely for sentamental value - never intends to shot a roll of film. I 
>> spoke up for the Nikkor ED AF 180/2.8 and bought a simple adapter to use 
>> that on my K20. I also have one of the Leica lenses, just because it looked 
>> and felt like a nice lens.
>> 
>> So, what can I do with it? Elmarit-M 1:2.9/28mm. I've done some poking 
>> around and have found a consensus that Leica-M and K-mount cannot mix due to 
>> flange depth issues or some such technical issue. As I understand it, the 
>> Leica lenses like to get up close and personal with the imaging medium, 
>> while the Pentax K is a bit more standoffish.
>> 
>> If I can't use the M-series on a K-body, then I can either shelve the Leica 
>> lens as a memorial, or I can buy a body (digital) which can use that lens.
>> 
>> I seem to recall that Godfrey, maybe others, have a Lummix G1 (?) usable via 
>> adapters with Pentax K-series, Leica M-series, and a multitude of other 
>> lenses.
>> Is it worth buying another camera body just to be able to use this lens? 
>> Alternatives to the G1? Leaving aside the M-9; the $7000 is a bit much for 
>> me right now.
>> 
>> One factor that may come into play - in his equipment stash my father-in-law 
>> also had other Leica lenses including IIRC a 35/2.8, 50/2.0, and 135/4.0.
>> 
>> stan
> 
> Two options.
> 
> Get an M mount body like the Voigtlander Bessa R2 or R3 series and shoot film.
> 
> Go digital with an M43 body and use those excellent lenses. The GF1 or
> Oly Pen's are the most leica-esque, but the G1 or G2 are good options
> as well. IN between the m43 stuff and the M9 remains the M8/M8.2,
> which can be had for $2-3k and are actually good, if quirky cameras
> (think *istD-level UI performance, just with way better IQ).
> 
And a magenta cast to all the shadow details.

Actually, IQ is just okay.
Paul


> -Adam
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to