I only sporadically check into my PESO mail folder and had not seen your previous two of this subject. Given others' comments on this, I went back for a comparison.
I prefer this one because: a. the mill is more clearly the reason for the photo; b. the stream leads my eye to that main subject; c. good dynamic range - reasonable sky, good shadow detail, but not unnatural looking. d. the water provides a dynamic element in a static picture. I prefer the previous because: a. the water here obscures the waterwheel. If I hadn't seen the previous and hadn't been told that this was a mill, I probably never would have thought that the shape under the water was a waterwheel. In all other respects I prefer the angle of this shot, but the previous did have the advantage that the wheel was recognizable as such. Why 3 @ 1/10 for your sandwich? To expand the apparent volume of water? stan On Apr 25, 2010, at 4:58 PM, John Sessoms wrote: > http://www.flickr.com/photos/jb_sessoms/4551951853/sizes/m/ > > K20D, Sigma 10-20 @10. Sandwich from four exposures 1/100 & 3x1/10. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
