On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 7:14 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Sandy Harris <[email protected]> wrote: > >>On 4/27/10, SV Hovland <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >does Pentax do anything along the lines of the micro-4/3rds? >> >>No, and I'd say they should. There is a Samsung along those lines. > > I got to play with the Samsung a couple of weeks ago (courtesy of our > pal Miserere) and it's a pretty cool little camera. "Not quite ready > yet" was my general impression - electronic viewfinder was awful (same > as the competition, in other words) and there were a few other little > foibles. But I know all this will improve in the future and was really > impressed with the size and feel of the camera. So much so that I'd > venture to say this is the wave of the future.
Significantly worse than the competition is a better description of the NX10's EVF, it's both significantly smaller and noticably lower in resolution than the G1/GH1 or E-P2/E-PL1 EVF's, although it does remain better than the GF1 or G10's low-rez EVF. The NX10's a good exercise in not quite there as that's pretty much a description of everything about it when compared to the Micro-4/3rds bodies. Nice camera overall, but there's better available, and for less money too. -- M. Adam Maas http://www.mawz.ca Explorations of the City Around Us. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
