Rob Studdert wrote: >On 05/05/2010, David Parsons <[email protected]> wrote: >> Well, I was referencing the posters in the DPReview thread, not at anyone >> here. >> >> It just seems that some people can't separate what they want from how >> they think the company should be run and get all indignant about >> Pentax not doing what they think is best according to them. > >I think that we have the right to comment, often the users have a >better idea of what companies should be doing compared to what they >are doing. For instance the very obvious fact that here and on other >forums Pentax shooters are either supplementing or entirely dumping >their Pentax kits for 36x24mm sensor bodies whilst Pentax is gearing >to provide a very niche 645D body and some lenses is difficult to >envision as a well conceived decision on so many levels.
Pentax does monitor this list from time to time and several suggestions posted here over the years have found their way onto production cameras. We can't be sure how many were as a result of what was posted here, but it's quite plausible that it has happened. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
