Alan wrote:
>I share the view of Dave O'brien on the LX. However, I have learnt that on >this list, one can only praise the mighty LX. Afterall, it's the only "PRO" >Pentax 135 body over the years. If Pentax had made something like F4 or F5, >Ithe LX would have been forgotten long ago. Not that I don't like the LX, >just that if it would be as reliable as most other non-PRO bodies. It's a >frustrated feeling when one felt when the LX would quit anytime on an >important trip. The Nikon F4 is pretty much forgotten by now whereas the F3 and LX are not. As far as I know the LX is a truly reliable machine. The problems actually comes from non-use. If the camera stays in the closed for years the rubber may go bad and the resistors (old type only) may corrode. Both are easy and cheap fixes. Cost no more than regular CLA on any camera something that should be done anyway when the camera is 10+ years old. P�l - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
