On May 22, 2010, at 8:16 AM, Adam Maas wrote: > On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 9:05 PM, paul stenquist <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> On May 21, 2010, at 8:54 PM, Rob Studdert wrote: >> >>> On 21/05/2010, Adam Maas <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> The K-7 pretty much nailed everything I wanted fixed about earlier >>>> Pentax DSLR's except the high ISO performance, which wasn't good >>>> enough to get me to upgrade. >>>> >>>> I still want a K-7x, the K-x is a great little body but the K-7's VF, >>>> build and sealing and LiIon batteries would be a big upgrade for me, I >>>> just need K-x level high ISO from it. >>> >>> I'm pretty much in the same boat, really I can't justify the purchase >>> of a K7 when the K-x K20D combo will do pretty much all I need for the >>> moment. >>> >> After 15,000 K7 frames, I'd be really bummed if I had to shoot with my K20 >> again. And a Kx doesn't have the battery or frame rate horsepower I need. >> Not to mention a viewfinder that's acceptable for manual focus. >> Paul > > Paul, > > K-x is 4.7fps, K-7 is 5.2fps. Only real difference is buffer depth. > Yep. 4.7 fps doesn't help much when the camera stops dead in the water. But Kx is very nice. I'd like one for the occasional low-light work. Although I'd want it to be able to lock focus in low light as readily as the k7 does. Not sure if it can do that.
Paul > -Adam > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
