I have both the 50-200 and 55-300, and they are both great lenses for
the price.  I would consider the 55-300 as an upgrade lens to the
50-200.

If you want to compare samples, these two links are my shots with each:

50-200:  http://www.flickr.com/photos/alohadave/tags/smcpda50200mmf456ed/
55-300:  http://www.flickr.com/photos/alohadave/tags/smcpda55300mmf458ed/

To be honest, I stopped using the 50-200 after I got the 55-300, and I
haven't used it in about a year and a half.  I find that the 55-300
works great as a portrait lens, tack sharp.  The only real drawback to
the 55-300 is that the minimum focus distance is four feet, not a
problem most of the time, but it can be an issue.

The only reason I might recommend the 50-200 is size.  It's about half
the length and weight of the 55-300.  The 55-300 is about $140 more,
but both are bargain priced, IMO, for the quality.  One interesting
thing is that the 50-200 appears to be WR (plus the barrel is
redesigned from the version I have) , while the 55-300 isn't.  AFAICT,
Pentax isn't offering the non-WR version anymore.

On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 9:53 PM, Ed Keeney <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm in the market for a new lens and looking for sage advice from the list.
>
> I'm currently using a K100D with the following zoom's...
>     FA 70-200 4-5.6
>     FA 100-300 4.5-5.6
>
> I find that the longer 100-300 is a little heavy so I tend to lean to
> the smaller 70-200.  My problem is that the shorter lens decided to go
> belly up with some internal mechanism problems and I fear it's beyond
> repair (or can be repaired, but not sure it would be worth it).
>
> I shoot the kids playing sports.  They're still young so I can get
> pretty close to the action.  I've attempted birding, but find even the
> 300 to be a little short (another day will bring a discussion on
> converters).
>
> I'm looking at replacing the broken lens (or both) with either the DA
> 50-200 4-5.6 or the DA 55-300 4-5.8.  Does anyone have real world
> experience with these two lenses?  I'm leaning to the shorter 50-200
> due to cost and equivalent replacement.
>
> Thanks!
> Ed
> http://picasaweb.google.com/ewkphoto
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.
>



-- 
Aloha Photographer Photoblog
http://alohaphotog.blogspot.com/

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to