I was thinking I may not up grade to LR3, but now.?? Dave
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Charles Robinson <[email protected]> wrote: > On Jun 10, 2010, at 11:02, Bob W wrote: > >> Examples for those of us whose LR3 hasn't arrived yet? >> > > Here we go. > > I had some strong backlighting and underexposed the subject horribly. > > K-7, ISO 800, with the exposure pushed in LR by +2.00 > > The two files have exactly the same processes - one is just a "virtual copy" > of the other with the only difference being the "Process 2003" or "Process > 2010" for the RAW converter. > > It's not perfect, but it's a good example of the differences. > > http://charles.robinsontwins.org/photos/2010/noise_process_2003.jpg > > and > > http://charles.robinsontwins.org/photos/2010/noise_process_2010.jpg > > I still think in this case that it's an unusable image. But it's a lot > better with the new process. Many other images in here have gone from "I > guess it's alright" to "hey, not bad at all!" > > -Charles > > -- > Charles Robinson - [email protected] > Minneapolis, MN > http://charles.robinsontwins.org > http://www.facebook.com/charles.robinson > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- Documenting Life in Rural Ontario. www.caughtinmotion.com http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ York Region, Ontario, Canada -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
