On Jul 13, 2010, at 6:30 PM, Adam Maas wrote: > On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Eric Weir <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Jul 13, 2010, at 3:41 PM, J.C. O'Connell wrote: >> >>> you may want to consider the K28/3.5 version, its >>> reputation is better than both m or a versions. >> >> . . . . >> >> I'm a bit unclear about K as a lens series versus K as a type of lens mount. >> Until this thread I assumed all -- or almost all -- Pentax lenses were K >> lenses. I gather now they are distinct classifications. However, as a >> reference to a lens series, I think I have yet to encounter a K lens. > > A brief history of Pentax K mount. > > . . . . > > Pentax lens lines:
Thanks for the informative history, Adam. However, I don't see where in the evolution of Pentax lenses I would find "the K28/3.5 version" recommended by J.C. Contrary to what I'd just begun assuming, there seems to be no K series of lenses. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric Weir Decatur, GA USA [email protected] -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
