lightroom is only useful for editing multiple pictures (batches of 10-20 or a 100+ images) at once. it is also great for cataloguing and it's perfect for tracking back all your changes. for editing a couple of pictures when you know what you want to do with them, ps can be better.
still, the workflow that i think is 'normal' is lr first than ps if needed. On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 8:08 PM, Tom C <[email protected]> wrote: > I've recently started carrying a corporate laptop and have been > Photoshopless on the road. I downloaded CS5 trial, now expired, and > now have a trial version of LR3. > > I'm sure the differences between PS and LR have been discussed ad > nauseum, yet I'm still curious about how others feel they compare. I > realize it's natural to prefer what one is accustomed to, and for me > that's been Photoshop since 3.0 thru CS2. > > My opinion after working / trying to work with LR is that I much > prefer Photoshop. I'm particularly irked that it does not let me > resize my image at any time in the editing process. I also find the > software itself uses up far too much screen real estate for itself in > default mode. > > Overall I prefer the interface of PS and the fact that it has no > pretenses of imposing a structured workflow of it's originators design > upon my postcapture processing. > > Tom C > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
