As is so often the case, what you wrote evidently didn't match what you meant to say. I'm sorry, I can't divine your intended meaning if you don't know how to write comprehensible English.
I've been using Lightroom through all beta and release versions for five years, have produced 6,000+ completed images for paid assignments, personal projects and gallery exhibitions with it. I've been teaching Lightroom and Photoshop in workshop classes and 1:1 consulting sessions for two years. I've documented and reported 165 bugs with LR since 2006, 138 of which have been verified by Adobe and fixed in subsequent releases. I don't consider myself to be "the definitive expert" in LR: I continue to learn new aspects of using it as I work on new types of projects and produce more and more work with it. But I bet that I know a feck of a lot more about using it than you do, Tom. You might consider spending some time to learn how it is supposed to work and gaining skill in using it before pronouncing stupid judgments and making statements that express your lack of understanding. On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Tom C <[email protected]> wrote: > As is often the case, you assume I know much less than I do, and > therefore interpret what I write as if I'm a total neophyte which is > not the case. Maybe that's because you perceive yourself as superior? > > You didn't tell me one thing there that I didn't already know. Nor did > I make a statement regarding how Lightroom works, in the post you just > responded to. > > If you'd read everything I wrote you'd see I was talking about two > different kinds of workflow. > > And of course, I don't know ALOT about using Lightroom as in my > opening post I stated I downloaded the trial version of LR3. > > Go talk down to someone else. > > Tom C. > > > > On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Tom C <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> What I find odd is that one would use an *automated* *image adjustment >>> workflow* in a manner that is like taking ones images to a 3rd party >>> processor and having all images processed using the same parameters. ... >> >> a) Who said anything about an *automated image adjustment workflow*? >> b) Where do you find this to be the case in the use of Lightroom? >> >> You can apply the same adjustments to as many or as few image >> simultaneously as you want. >> You can apply any specifically different adjustments you want to any >> individual image you want at any time you want. >> >> In other words, with Lightroom, you can automate doing as much, or as >> little, of the workflow as is sensible for what you are trying to >> achieve. >> >> You're speaking as someone who presumes quite a lot but knows quite >> little about using Lightroom. I suggest you go to one of the several >> free sites offering Lightroom tutorials and work your way through a >> few of them so that you understand it better before you make >> statements about how it works. >> >> -- >> Godfrey >> godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. >> > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- Godfrey godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
