FYI, the FA20-35 works great with digital. The range may not be as interesting as it was with film, but image quality is wonderful. it's also surprisingly light.
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 6:56 AM, mike wilson <[email protected]> wrote: > Brian Walters wrote: > >> On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 01:48 -0500, "Ira H. Bryant IV" >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 07:28:25 +0100 >>> mike wilson <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Ira H. Bryant IV wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Anyway, I know that I'm not answering the question you asked, but I >>>>> hope it helps anyway. >>>> >>>> >>>> Mark! >>> >>> C'mon, if the people on this list only answered the questions that were >>> asked then the list would have died off ages ago! :) >> >> >> >> Well - Let's MARK! that as well.... > > I hope you're not going to take that lying down, Ira.... > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- Steve Desjardins -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
