Technically not but what you said was prone to being taken personally.
Too prone for comfort IMO. Typical 'clash of perceived absolute
truths' situation...
How about you guys settle this and return to your common subject?
Cheers
Ecke

2010/8/30 P. J. Alling <[email protected]>:
> Ad hominem?  To Quote Indgo Montoya "I do not think it means what you think
> it means."  I made no attack on  you personally only your knowledge.  You
> can learn can't you?
>
> On 8/27/2010 3:44 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>> I'm sorry you are unable to discuss the issues without resorting to an
>> ad hominem attack.  I therefore feel it best if I do not respond.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to