Thanks, Steven.
I suspected it would be too much to hope for a pancake lens. I figure
it's most likely the SMC-M 50mm -- most likely the f/2.
Any idea if the Tokina is any good? I haven't been able to find much
info on it -- which leads me to believe it's no great shakes.
Thanks again,
Walt
On 9/3/2010 10:11 AM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
I had an MV1. Mine came with and M 40 2.8 pancake. The camera was
OK, but I sold the lens for more than I paid for the original
combination. The problem is that then lens in the picture doesn't
look at all like the 40.
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Walter Gilbert<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi all,
Just wanted to solicit some opinions as to whether or not this would be
worth an hour-and-a-half drive.
http://nashville.craigslist.org/pho/1926150370.html
I was thinking it might be worth the trip for the glass alone, but don't
know what lens usually came with the camera. Any thoughts and advice would
be appreciated.
Thanks,
-- Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
