On Sep 11, 2010, at 3:15 PM, Jack Davis wrote: > The quality of many of the images was better than I expected to see. Your > intuitive "metering" made all the difference, I'm sure, Larry. > A couple models of the "brick" were metered, but I don't believe the C3 > was.(?)
No it wasn't. The light meter I was using was saying that ISO 200 in full sunlight was f/16 at 1/300, and I'd fudge a bit on that depending on circumstances. Once dusk started hitting, I'd meter a bit more frequently. Processing the scans in lightroom works a lot better than I used to be able to do in the darkroom too. -- Larry Colen [email protected] sent from i4est -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
