Miserere wrote: >On 13/09/2010, Steven Desjardins <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Mark Roberts <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Miserere wrote: >>> >>>>Or...Pentax could just make DFS optional so those who want to turn it >>>>off and do DFS with software of the computer can do so, and those who >>>>don't know what the hell DFS is (or don't care) will leave the camera >>>>on the default "DFS: ON". >>>> >>>>For what it's worth, even a camera like the Panasonic G2 has the >>>>option to turn DFS off, so there's no reason for Pentax not to >>>>implement it. >>> >>> Looks like the noise reduction on the new K-R is pretty customizable >>> http://forums.dpreview.com/previews/pentaxkr/page2.asp >>> Hope that includes dark frame subtraction. >>> >> If nothing else it appears you can turn off the NR. >>> >But can you do it for long exposures? That's the issue here.
Indeed. That's the question. Until someone gets their hands on the camera, we won't know for certain. One would *hope* that the high level of customizability offered for standard NR might indicate the designers realize that control over noise reduction is important to some users. And that this knowledge might carry over to DFS on long exposures. But you never know. I don't know that I've ever seen the issue mentioned in mainstream reviews. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
