"Burning human rights and civil liberties on the altar of national security is certainly not what the founding fathers had in mind."
That is hardly an accurate description of what happened in this case. Dan On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 11:16 AM, eckinator <[email protected]> wrote: > 2010/9/15 Daniel J. Matyola <[email protected]>: >> I agree. I don't understand why the newspaper insisted on >> investigating and reporting on this either. He was a good >> photographer, and took some great images of the civil rights movement. >> I am confident nothing he told the FBI harmed Martin Luther King or >> the movement. Why drag it up now? > > I think this is why: > > "It speaks to the problem of secrecy. The government is able to do > things in the shadows that are really questionable. That goes to the > heart of our (democratic) society.'' (Theoharis quote from the > original article as linked by John Sessoms) > > To me this is not about Whithers but about government. Burning human > rights and civil liberties on the altar of national security is > certainly not what the founding fathers had in mind. Saddening in that > context that the ultra right of all political groups should call > itself the tea party movement when in fact their last president was > all about internal oppression. > > *asbestos suit on* > > Cheers > Ecke > > ----------------------------------------- > Cameras don’t shoot people. > Photographers shoot people. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
