I've owned numerous Pentax lenses since 1969 and have never had even a hint of an issue with them.......
until I got the SMC DA* 16-50mm f2.8 about a year and a half ago.

It worked fine for several months but earlier this year on a photo shoot in Utah it started not to auto focus. I could manually focus but still the lense was less than a year old! I was going to ship it back for repair, but then it started to auto focus again and this on again/off again operation continues to this day.
Can't figure it out.


Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller

----- Original Message ----- From: "paul stenquist" <pnstenqu...@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: I don't like being the squeaky wheel, but...



On Oct 2, 2010, at 5:02 AM, eckinator wrote:

2010/10/2 John Sessoms <jsessoms...@nc.rr.com>:

Well, to the extent that they reduce a business cost, but what I mean is
Pentax doesn't make X number of Dollars, Euro, Yen ... profit off of each
repair as was implied.

It's just a bad business practice to manufacture shoddy goods, and then
expect to make money off of repairing defects, especially if you don't
actually repair the defects meaning the item has to be repaired again and
again.

If Pentax does that, they won't be in business long. They've got their
faults as a company, but I just don't think they're that stupid.

agreed. not as a business objective and repairs aren't a profit center
either I hope but I'd think parts are cost (including warehousing and
administration) plus X and I'd think there'd be a kickback of sorts
from CRIS also but can't know for a fact of course. Amen to the shoddy
goods bit though, SDM doesn't cut it - I just hope DC does...
Ecke

What's DC? Have you had trouble with an SDM lens, Ecke? I know Robb and Celio did. Has anyone else on the list had a failure? I'm genuinely curious. I have three that SDM lenses I've used extensively since they were first released, and they work very well. Maybe I got lucky. Or perhaps failures are magnified on the web, because the victims complain loudly, while those of us who are satisfied are mum for the most part.
Paul


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to