On Oct 12, 2010, at 12:22, Walter Gilbert wrote: > Hi Eric, > > I consider the Takumar an unfairly maligned lens. I took the following three > shots with the 135mm/2.5 bayonet the first few times I ever used it, and > wouldn't hesitate to pay $40 for it. > > http://www.flickr.com/photos/walt_gilbert/4895210419/in/set-72157624608728365/#/ > http://www.flickr.com/photos/walt_gilbert/4894906307/in/set-72157624608728365/ > http://www.flickr.com/photos/walt_gilbert/4895746210/in/set-72157624608728365/ >
I agree that you can get good results from that $40 lens. http://charles.robinsontwins.org/photos/2009/hitchcock_varsity/content/IMGP0549_large.html Mostly I just use mine for concert shots, so flare isn't really a concern (and sometimes helps the image). -Charles -- Charles Robinson - [email protected] Minneapolis, MN http://charles.robinsontwins.org http://www.facebook.com/charles.robinson -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
