I think it's the same design as the SMC [K] 135 f3.5, much as the SMC
[K] f2.5 is the same optically as it's immediate predecessor, the SMC
Takumar 135 f2.5.
If that's true it's a fine performer, very sharp, very light compared to
the 2.5. The only problem is it's a PITA to focus in dim light on any
camera with a less that stellar focusing system.
I was extremely lucky, my copy of the SMC [K] 135 f3.5 came my way as a
lens cap on a MX purchased on ebay.
On 10/13/2010 12:36 AM, Jerry in Arizona wrote:
OK, I have an SMC Takumar 3.5 (M42) that I picked up pretty cheap that I use on
my K20D. Have not used it much but early results seem good. Any comments on
this lens?
--
"His lack of education is more than compensated for by his keenly developed moral
bankruptcy."
-Woody Allen
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
