That's bad argument, Bill. Just get one of those 67 to 645 adapter. Oh maybe you didn't want to know about that one? ;)
2010/10/13, William Robb <[email protected]>: > > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "jtainter" > Subject: If you have $10,000 > >> ...burning a hole in your pocket: >> >> http://www.pentaxwebstore.com/detail/PTX+17971 > > I'll get right on that. > In some respects, I'm glad I bought the 6x7 rather than the 645 back in > 1985. It makies seeing this a lot easier. If I had as many 645 lenses > floating around as 6x7 lenses I would tempt divorce and credit card fraud > about now. > > William Robb > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- Thibault Massart aka Thibouille/Thibs ---------------------- Photo: K-7, Sigma 28/1.8 macro, FA50/1.4, DA40Ltd, K30/2.8, DA16-45, DA50-135, DA50-200, 360FGZ ... Laptop: Macbook 13" Unibody SnowLeo/Win7 Programing: Delphi 2009 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
