What a funny shot (the 100% crop). It has a little blur and still displays amazing resolution. In my mind those two would have been contradictory effects. Another world view shattered.
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 4:44 AM, Larry Colen <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Oct 15, 2010, at 1:36 AM, Bong Manayon wrote: > >> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Larry Colen <[email protected]> wrote: >>> The 645D sounds like an amazing camera. And I've seen a couple of the >>> sample pictures, probably the same ones that everyone else on the list has >>> seen. As an engineer, I'm acutely aware of the difference between a demo, >>> and real world performance. Has anyone on the list seen any photos taken >>> by "real customers" with 645Ds? Where they on a screen, or prints? Did >>> they look as good as we'd like to imagine them looking? >>> >> >> Here-- >> >> Snaps taken with the Pentax 645D + SMCP FA645 75/2.8 inside a dark >> walled lounge with overhead flourescent light. Shot at ISO1000, 1/30 >> (so the blur in the last photo) & f3.5. For the pixel peeper, there's >> a 100% crop of the last photo. >> >> http://i251.photobucket.com/albums/gg292/bongm131/IMGP0311-web.jpg >> http://i251.photobucket.com/albums/gg292/bongm131/IMGP0312-web.jpg >> http://i251.photobucket.com/albums/gg292/bongm131/IMGP0313-web.jpg >> http://i251.photobucket.com/albums/gg292/bongm131/IMGP0313-web-cropped.jpg > > For a 100% crop at ISO 1000, that doesn't entirely suck. > > -- > Larry Colen [email protected] sent from i4est > > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- Steve Desjardins -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
