On 22 October 2010 13:49, Jaume Lahuerta <[email protected]> wrote: > ----- Mensaje original ---- >> De: Miserere <[email protected]> >> Para: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >> Enviado: vie,22 octubre, 2010 18:02 >> Asunto: Re: DxO test of Pentax 645D >> >> On 22 October 2010 11:25, Jaume Lahuerta <[email protected]> wrote: >> > I am afraid it is in Spanish: >> > (some charts though) >> > >>http://www.dslrmagazine.com/pruebas/pruebas-tecnicas/pentax-645d-sensor-raw.html >> > >> > The conclusion: it is the 4th best sensor ever tested for DxO with a >>similar >> > noise to Nikon D3x. >> >> And here's a comparison that should make Mark rather happy, the 645D >> vs the Sony A850: >> >>http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/en/Camera-Sensor/Compare-sensors/%28appareil1%29/668|0/%28appareil2%29/604|0/%28onglet%29/0/%28brand%29/Pentax/%28brand2%29/Sony >>y >> >> It seems the main thing you're giving up by getting the Sony A850 is >> pixels. >> > > > > So, we have the MF equivalent to K-7, nice body and sensor...just ok? > :-(
Well...if you need 40MP, then you need 'em. And let's not forget that the 645D might handle better than many other medium format digitals, which is important (to some of us). It's also weathersealed, which other MF cameras aren't. What I'd like to see is a comparison between a 645D image and the equivalent shot on a FF DSLR up-rezzed to 40MP. That will tell us what advantage the 645D does or doesn't have. --M. -- \/\/o/\/\ --> http://WorldOfMiserere.com http://EnticingTheLight.com A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
