I agree. However, I don't care for the blurred horses--they should either be much blurrier or much sharper (either through panning or a higher shutter speed). I see you used f/8, 1/350, ISO 200, so you have lots of "room for maneuver" on exposure.
Rick http://photo.net/photos/RickW --- On Tue, 10/26/10, Steven Desjardins <[email protected]> wrote: > Nice. Much better distribution > of tones. In the other shot the > horses sort of blended together. > > On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Daniel J. Matyola <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Another image, a few seconds after my earlier > steeplechase photo: > > > > http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=11855894 > > > > Comments, Criticisms, Suggestions and Abuse still > Welcome. > > > > Dan > > http://tinyurl.com/matyola > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > [email protected] > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link > directly above and follow the directions. > > > > > > -- > Steve Desjardins > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link > directly above and follow the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
