Go for it. If it doesn't work, be sure to tell us so we can sympathize. On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 11:13 PM, Jeffery Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > I have been using faster lenses (77/1.8) for stage productions until now, but > want to get a bit closer with a zoom. Do any of you who have this lens feel > that it will focus reliably in sometimes dim stage lights with a K-7? > Because of the added length, I'm taking a Porter bean bag to use as a rest. > > What ISO do I dare use indoor under incandescent lighting from floods? I'm > shooting it entirely RAW, so I can fiddle with color correction later on the > Mac. > > What say you? Feedback from the intelligentsia is welcomed, gas-baggy or not, > whoopee cushion or not, and I won't criticize your reading ability. My only > other long telephoto choices are 70-200 2.8 Sigma (10 years old), or a 50-200 > Zuiko that I got with my E-1 (but I can use it on my more recent Panasonic. > > Jeffery Smith > About to photography Bat Boy, like my reputation depends on it. > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. >
-- Steve Desjardins -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
