Yep, I agree; it's so important to have solid ISO 800 & 1600 quality with as
little noise as possible. Good example here, Paul. Cheers, Christine
----- Original Message -----
From: "P N Stenquist" <[email protected]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 10:36 AM
Subject: K-5 at ISO 1600
While testing the camera at 6400 and beyond is fun, good results at ISO
800 and 1600 are much more important for my work. I shot this little
garden nymph at ISO 1600 with the DA* 50-135 at dusk yesterday. I
converted in my normal fashion with a bit of fill light and curve
adjustment. It's sharpened a bit post conversion with PhotoShop's Smart
Sharpen Gaussian.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=11894538
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
