On Nov 9, 2010, at 5:00 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
Sure, but I'd like to see the K5, Kr, and Kx compared as well. I
mean, my K7 has all that other stuff and it's a terrible camera.
My K-7 is a very good camera, not perfect, but very good. I wouldn't
trade it for Kx.
Paul
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 4:53 PM, P N Stenquist
<[email protected]> wrote:
On Nov 9, 2010, at 4:31 PM, CheekyGeek wrote:
That K-7 image looks like my old K200D at ISO 1600.
(Which would make it a 2 stop improvement) but still an unfortunate
amount of noise, in my book.
Those who think the K-7 image looks GOOD have to be K-7 owners.
: )
I'd rather see a comparison between the K-x at 6400 and the K5 at
6400
and see how much improvement an extra $1000 makes.
Noise is only a small part of it. You also get better exposure
control,
weather sealing, better build quality, better write speed, better
battery
life and you don't get lumped in with people who buy red cameras:-).
Paul
Darren Addy
Kearney, Nebraska
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
and
follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
and
follow the directions.
--
Steve Desjardins
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
and follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
