Margus, Given the amount of travel in some of my lenses, I think the idea is a non-starter. Digital cameras are too thick now. This would only make it worse. Regards, Bob S.
2010/11/12 Margus Männik <mar...@eol.ee>: > I know about Contax, I've even tested it years ago. AX autofocus wasn't > simply slow, it was a disaster. Still it doesn't mean that in-body AF > couldn't be done better - especially if we consider that instead of film > mechanism there's only a sensor to move. After all, weight comparison > between lens (group) and sensor chip is the cornerstone of in-body SR. How > many people said "it can not be done" before Pentax engineers just came and > did it? > > BR, Margus > > > > On 11/11/2010 11:58 PM, Adam Maas wrote: >> >> 2010/11/11 Margus Männik<mar...@eol.ee>: >>> >>> Want some crazy suggestion? ;) >>> Future Pentax bodies will have in-body autofocus. It's much faster to >>> move a >>> light sensor than tons of glass. And you'll have AF with any K-mount lens >>> (and others that you can mount via adapters) ever produced. Great, isn't >>> it? >>> Why it still has a focus-ring... hmm, well, it's for a backward >>> compatibility and manual focus, of course. >>> >>> BR, Margus >> >> In body AF has been done (Contax AX), it's MUCH faster to move the >> glass and far less trouble to keep aligned. >> >> -Adam >> > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
