If/when I get the K-5, I know that, in about 18 months when the K-3 comes out, I would have to endure months of talk about what a poor camera the K-5 is. If I stick with the K-20, we are mostly past that phase. But thanks for the advice Larry ;-) If it weren't for insurance coverage, just guessing at the retail value of the operation, my outlay would probably be closer to the cost of a 654-D kit. Now there we would be talking about a serious trade-off decision!
stan On Nov 16, 2010, at 6:28 PM, Larry Colen wrote: > > On Nov 16, 2010, at 2:54 PM, Miserere wrote: > >> On 16 November 2010 11:59, Stan Halpin <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hey John - I go in Friday morning for the same thing. Send some good >>> thoughts my way . . . >>> Best of luck and best wishes for a rapid recovery. >>> >>> stan >> >> Dammit, Stan, how unoriginal ;-) > > Yeah, if you're going to follow the crowd you should have bought a K-5 > instead. It's cheaper, more fun, and a lot less of a pain in the ass. >> > > -- > Larry Colen [email protected] sent from i4est > > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
