On Nov 22, 2010, at 1:39 AM, Larry Colen wrote:

> Even though I already know I want one. These are the things that I'm curious 
> about especially how it compares with other cameras.
> 
> On Nov 21, 2010, at 8:40 PM, Miserere wrote:
> 
>> I convinced B&H to lend me a K-5 for review and it should arrive
>> tomorrow (Monday). I won't have it as long as other cams I've tested
>> (it's going back on Dec 15th)  so I'm trying to streamline this review
>> as much as possible and keep out any superfluous fluff.
>> 
>> If any of you guys have any particular requests for things you'd like
>> me to check that you think *must* be included in a self-respecting
>> review, I'd love to hear from you.
> 
> 
> With every camera, there is a learning curve about how to get the most out of 
> it.  Has any of the people with the K-5 figured out any of the specifics with 
> theirs?
> For example, with my K20, night photography seems to work best at ISO 400, 
> being the best balance between sensitivity and noise.
> 
ISO 1600 on the k5 is approximately equivalent -- in visible noise -- to ISO 
400 on the K20

> Actually, I'd love to see a site that has a database of all of these quirks 
> and hints for any camera.  But, for streamlining your review process, maybe 
> some hints from others could save you a little time.
> 
> I'm most interested in how well it does in cases where other cameras fall 
> short.  Some of my requests/suggestions are coupled with particular lenses 
> that you may or may not have.
> 
> While the video capabilities had nothing to do with my interest in my K-x, I 
> have found that for short clips, it makes a better video camera than my dv 
> camcorder. The sensor and the optical path are both orders of magnitude 
> better. One way that it particularly excels is in low light sensitivity.  I 
> suspect that the K-5 is yet another big step up over the K-x.
> 
> I'd like to see what it can do as video in difficult light situations:
> 
> *   Low light in general. Maybe indoors with poor light, where you'd be 
> shooting ISO 800 or above in order to hand hold.
> *  Nasty dynamic range situations.  Someone blowing out the candles on a 
> birthday cake.
> *  I'm often taking videos of my friends playing music.  Could you put an 
> FA77 on it and spend an evening in a dive bar taking pictures and video of 
> blues musicians?
> 
> In more conventional photography:
> I've seen what Ralf can do with his in industrial settings.  I'd like to see 
> what one can do more along the lines of Dave Savage's work. Night landscapes 
> with stars visible.  That may not be possible in Boston in November though.
> 
> Put a DA40 (or maybe the DA35 macro, or the pfa50/1.4 or any of the small 
> primes) on it, and put it in your coat pocket, or fanny pack spend a few 
> hours walking around the city and see how it fares as a "pocket SLR".  Bonus 
> points if you can do this both before and after dark for a bit of Theraultian 
> street photography.
> 
> If you're interested in seeing how it does at autosports, I can ping a friend 
> in your area that does autocross and the like and see if there are any fun 
> events that involve people driving cars at silly fast speeds, to test it's 
> autofocus.
> 
> I'm curious how it works shooting dancers in ridiculously low light.  If you 
> want, I could put you in touch with my friends in your area that do dance.
> 
> Another couple of torture tests that would be interesting to see how it does, 
> and how it compares to other cameras are available light shots of children 
> playing indoors and people playing fast paced sports.
> 
> How well does it work with P-TTL flash (AF-540 etc). My K100 and K20 were 
> often unusable, my K-x is better, but still easily tricked.

I've found it generally does well with the AF-540, although I mentioned an 
exception in another post  -- using an Xtender in relatively close range at 
high (1250) ISO. I have to make sure I didn't have a bad connection here that 
might have triggered full manual.

Paul


> 
> --
> Larry Colen [email protected] sent from i4est
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to