Jim, I'm not concerned about a correct exposure indication, but actually TTL exposure capability. I already own a 433D with Canon dedication. I Use it on the SP as an Auto Thyristor flash, but I wanted to have TTL capability. If the Sunpak doesn't have it, then I'll have to look out for the ever so elusive 280T.
Jeff ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Apilado" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2002 6:33 PM Subject: Re: Sunpak 433D, how dedicated? > On my LX the 433 dedicated for Pentax only shows flash ready. It won't > indicate "correct exposure" with a blinking diode as with the 280T. Still a > good flash. > > Jim A. > > > From: "Jeff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 16:17:57 -0500 > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Sunpak 433D, how dedicated? > > > > Just won an ebay auction for a 433D dedicated to Pentax TTL. > > How dedicated is it with the SP? > > I'm concerned because it has only 2 contacts, as oppose to 3 on the SP. > > > > TIA, Jeff > > - > > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
