On Nov 27, 2010, at 3:44 PM, Brian Walters wrote: >> Got my new scanner in the mail this morning. >> >> I like it very much. Been fooling around, relearning how to scan negs. >> It's been nearly 10 years since I've scanned for myself. >> >> I've made a couple scans at 3200 dpi and the results are good enough >> for me. Those scans net me a JPG file that's 5mb and equates to a >> little more than 8x12 at 300dpi. There is just a hint of softness to >> the scans, but nothing someone would notice unless they're pixel >> peeping.
> On Sat, 27 Nov 2010 11:28 -0600, "Nick David Wright" > <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't know how 'good' this is but I came across it some months ago on > a blog I follow occasionally: > > http://photo-utopia.blogspot.com/2010/11/scanning-with-epson-v500.html > Note that the blog is referring to scans from medium format film. Your 3200 choice may be a better starting point for 35mm images. stan -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
